David Cameron: homosexual couples will enjoy tax breaks too

By Rosa Prince, Political Correspondent Published: 6:00PM GMT 03 March 2010

The Tory personality additionally betrothed that proposals to magnify stretchable operative would request to homosexuals, along with taxation breaks for tied together couples

In the ultimate try by the Conservatives to woo the "pink vote," Mr Cameron insisted that the celebration was no longer antagonistic to homosexual people.

Vicars could be sued for refusing happy marriages Paternity leave plan behind as Lord Mandelson bows to commercial operation The Tories are not hungry, so energy might evade them David Camerons rising star Nick Herbert marries his beloved MPs expenses: Censorship hull Gordon Browns oath over pure supervision Feud grips new Tory Euro organisation

The partys offer to magnify maternity and paternity leave rights would request to same-sex couples who adopted or used synthetic insemination to conceive.

He told Attitude magazine: "All the plans to behind matrimony would additionally be plans to behind polite partnership.

"All the plans for stretchable operative for heterosexual couples would be plans that would be accessible for happy couples.

"All the plans for full coherence over maternity and paternity leave would be accessible for adoptive homosexual couples as well as heterosexual couples."

Mr Cameron pronounced that there were a series of homosexuals in distinguished positions in the Conservative party, who electorate could see to as justification that the Tories had changed.

He added: "They can see at slightest 3 plainly happy people on the front bench, dual of whom have had polite partnerships.

"They can see candidates, not in far off destroyed seats we are never going to win, but in seats we already hold and seats where we need a unequivocally small pitch to win.

"Has the Conservative Party got an glorious jot down on all these things? No, it hasn"t.

"Have we as a Conservative Party done unequivocally great swell on this issue, violation down these barriers and recognising where we have got things wrong in the past and frankly, being unequivocally upfront and observant on Section 28, we got it wrong, we apologise? I think we can."